美国恐怖故事

Sydney Wildlife Rescue Saves 'Gerry the Gentle Shark' From Ocean Pool_我的网站

A |     A crested horn shark happened to have become stuck in an ocean pool in Sea Life Sydney Aquarium on Saturday after being stranded by low tide in Fairlight Rockpool, but the story has a happy ending: the shark was saved by wildlife rescuers and even given a nickname - "Gerry the Gentle Shark".,The heart-warming story was reported by The Sydney Morning Herald, with the outlet revealing that ocean pools sometimes trap wild animals because of big surfs or high tides.,“It happens quite a lot, especially in the netted swimming areas and ocean pools, this is the main thing we respond to,” aquarist Emily Best, who ended up as a shark savior, told the outlet. “Once they’re in, it’s very difficult for them to get out of there; generally it takes someone to actually take them out again.",The animals are usually discovered when the pools are being cleaned or drained.,Gerry received his nickname for a reason - crested horn sharks are harmless and very "docile," as Best puts it. However, not every animal is as gentle as Gerry.,"But if it were a stingray or something I wouldn’t handle it, I would use a net and have multiple staff with me,” she said. “Other shark species, like the dusky whaler, are a lot quicker and I wouldn’t be able to catch that without the help of multiple people and by setting up a bit of a corral.",The crested horn shark lives off the coast of eastern Australia, usually found in rocky areas of Sydney harbor. It never harms humans, preferring to hunt for sea urchins and other small creatures.。1月15日：据9to5Mac新闻报道，已知的第一起执法案件发生在几个月前的美国。联邦调查局要求嫌疑犯用身份证解锁他的手机。然而，在《福布斯》14日的一份报告中，加利福尼亚州一名法官裁定，政府不能强迫人们通过生物识别功能解锁他们的手机，即使他们有命令。在这起案件中，加利福尼亚州北部地区法院听取了警方的意见，他们正在寻求搜查令，作为Facebook敲诈案的一部分。案件中的受害者被要求支付一笔钱，以避免向公众发布“令人尴尬”的视频。执法当局想用搜查令来搜查他们认为在此案中的嫌疑人的财产。在一次突袭中，他们试图通过面部识别码和触摸识别码解锁嫌疑人的手机。法官同意警方有逮捕令，但无权强迫嫌疑人通过生物识别技术解锁他们的设备。KandisWestmore法官表示，这一要求“过于宽泛，不能仅限于特定的人员或设备”。值得注意的是，如果执法机关要求更窄的逮捕令，这项特别裁决将来可能会被推翻。然而，更广泛地说，威斯特莫尔法官裁定，即使有逮捕令，也不能强迫嫌疑人通过人脸识别和触摸识别等生物识别技术来解开他们的罪行。

B | 法官在裁决中解释说，在解锁手机的情况下，指纹和面部识别与实物证据不同。”如果一个人因为证词交流而不能被强制提供密码，那么他就不能被强制提供指纹、虹膜、面部或其他生物特征识别功能来解锁同一个设备，”法官写道。韦斯特莫尔说，除了在突袭中发现的设备之外，还有其他方法可以访问“不违反第五修正案”所需的数据。这包括访问Facebook和请求访问Facebook信使对话。

C | 在去年10月的一份新闻报道中，联邦调查局要求嫌疑犯向iPhoneX展示自己的脸，以解锁手机。

D | 当时，《第五修正案》没有保护面部识别和触摸识别。威斯特莫尔法官的裁决将随着时间的推移而生效，理想情况下为用户提供与字母数字密码相同的面部识别和触摸ID法律保护。

Current article:http://www.zangjiwuqihuncongcherua.cyou/tms5/8to07j.htm

Published on:14:53:52